The form of the current occupation is
not a style manifesto.The principals of solidarity out of the
Wall Street Occupation are not a Hot Topic fashion coup. The demands that are published in their
Fifth Communique are not the ramblings of some overheated fashion
editor.
They are, instead, a political
platform.
The hemming and hawing one hears,
regarding how the occupiers “look like hippies,” or how their
form is “just like the recent anti-war protests” or how they
“lack a message” are wrong. This is a different situation, this
is a unique response to a uniquely ongoing crisis. As such, it's
technically impossible for the response to be “the same”, but
that's besides the point.
As should be now common knowledge,
capitalism in the United States (and elsewhere) fosters ever more
shit-employement, a further impoverishment of the public sphere, an
ever more disfunctionalizing political systems, and alienating
social forms. It sucks, and the bet of this occupation, of any open
occupation or open radical forum is that peoples from all walks of
life, alienated from the ever-shrinking
structural “mainstream” “centricity” will find their future
in the movement, its plazas and platforms and barricades.
As many have commented, we have before
us an opportunity for real, general, movement. Though there have been
localized resistances, (Wisconsin, Empire Windows and Doors, New
School and UC Occupations, The push-back
against defunding of Planned Parenthood etc..) we have now a form
that, in a generalized manner (99% might understand) can be the wind
behind these and other struggles. Yes, there is a qualitative
difference between local and general struggles, this is true. But to
discount the general struggle because of the way it looks or the way
it talks is wrong. Change happens with the movement you have, not the
movement you want. If not now, when? To fault this movement because
it doesn't look like this or that group of people is, in my
understanding, a mis-read of the nature of radically progressive
politics.
Movements happen not because people want things to stay the same but because folks realize that something has to change. This is a first step in bringing individuals into action. In become active, in become activists, people individually go from accepting the status quo to recognizing the need for something new. Only “conservative” movements suggest a need to go back to some imagined “was.” Radical, progressive movements, like this one, instead suggest the need to invent new forms, new ways of being as individuals and collectives. The open forums that characterized Tahrir, the Spanish Plazas and the new Occupations of Liberty and elsewhere are such forums for which to forge that new look.
For the movement to be successful, that
new look, or better, the many new looks will be forged in the course
of movements. To predetermine the look (as designers or political
organizers) is to limit the movement's potential, is to be bound into
“the student look”, “the hippy look”, “the same format of
the RNC protests”, “the antiwar protests etc...” or some
formula that will limit the potential for real generalization.
And this here is where style matters. To allow for this or any other general movement to grow, there need be a sensitivity to the difference between what people are saying and how they say it. There need be a sensitivity to the fact that under this political platform and principals of solidarity, many manifestations are possible. Thus we need to design a keen eye as to what people hope too appear as and not how they currently look, a sensitive ear as to what individuals aspire to sound like and not how they sound. Thrill started somewhere, the civil rights movement started somewhere. In that manner, any movement that begins with a bunch of students or a bunch of leftists will in the end come to look like our movement. And it will look like nothing we've ever seen before.
And this here is where style matters. To allow for this or any other general movement to grow, there need be a sensitivity to the difference between what people are saying and how they say it. There need be a sensitivity to the fact that under this political platform and principals of solidarity, many manifestations are possible. Thus we need to design a keen eye as to what people hope too appear as and not how they currently look, a sensitive ear as to what individuals aspire to sound like and not how they sound. Thrill started somewhere, the civil rights movement started somewhere. In that manner, any movement that begins with a bunch of students or a bunch of leftists will in the end come to look like our movement. And it will look like nothing we've ever seen before.
The nature of
social movements; from the technical/social movement generated with
the mass-production of the automobile, to the theological social
movement generated with the schism between Rome and the Protestants,
to the social movements generated in the civil rights era- they all
radically alter the ways that people look and dress and talk and
sound and live. Occupy Wall Street gives form for a generalized
movement that may have the potential to radically alter things- it
has a structure in which to incorporate yet is differentiated enough
in order to forge something yet unknown.
I among many have
been waiting for this for some years now. Lets all stop being
fashionistas sneering at the pages of Vogue and instead join in on
the forging of something radically beautiful.
Thanks
to Benjamin Heim Shepard, Beka Economopoulos
and Olive McKeon and my friends at Occupy Everything for ideas and
words which helped me write this piece.
Note from Benjamin Shepard. Thanks for contributing Marc. After you helped me put together my first writings on social movements and play in JOAP, its an honor to have you post on this blog. Its also a pleasure to respond to the dude on Wall Street yesterday, who chimed in that we were "Fucking hippies."
"I'm not a hippy" I wanted to respond. "But I am with them." Thanks to Marc for helping explain why.
Hello There,
ReplyDeleteI just wanted to see if you were currently interested in additional guest bloggers for your blog site.
I see that you've accepted some guest posters in the past - are there any specific guidelines you need me to follow while making submissions?
If you're open to submissions, whom would I need to send them to?
I'm eager to send some contributions to your blog and think that I can cover some interesting topics.
Thanks for your time,
Tess