The last day of the century at Esperanza garden with Rev billy, aresh, brad, luis, mario and this writer. |
It was fifteen years ago this weekend that Rudy Giuliani bulldozed our beloved Esperanza community garden.
With word that the city plans to sell of 17 gardens, we remember Esperanza and tweet:
@deBlasioNYC Don't destroy the Electric Ladybug, Tranquility & other#CommunityGardens #DontBeRudy @596Acres.
On Tuesday at City Hall, we screamed: "Don't be Rudy!" Mayor de Blasio, find another way. Gardens are not getting in the way of affordable housing. They support them. Gardens are homes we declared last week.
Esperanza was our home. And so are the gardens under threat today. Save the gardens and make them permanent.
Esperanza was our home. And so are the gardens under threat today. Save the gardens and make them permanent.
The campaign to save Esperanza and the other gardens was one of the most exciting and heartfelt of my life. On the fifteenth anniversary of its destruction, its worth remembering. A long chapter in my book Play, Creativity, and Social Movements covers those months between late 1999 and February 2000 when the campaign heated up.
Throughout this
period, a festive spirit of defiance combined a range of tactics, both with serious as well as ludic
dispositions. While Brad Will lead the
tripod crew for the Times Square RTS action, he was also one of the activists
who participated in the multiple days of jail solidarity in Seattle the
following week. The mixture of bits and
pieces of direct action helped a create a rich mixture of activists
dispositions within an upsurge of activism.
The Times Square action was held in solidarity with the following week’s
WTO uprising in Seattle; indeed, many RTS activists left jail for flights to
the West Coast the following day. What had started as a movement about the
quality of life in one town had become part of an international resistance
effort. As everyone sat around telling stories waiting for activists to get out
jail the day before, Aresh stood to tell the story of a garden which had not
been saved the previous spring. The name
of the garden was Esperanza.
The Struggle for Esperanza
In
the fall of 1999, JKtheCat received a phone call:
So, we, like many people, were
under the impression that the gardens were saved when the auction was canceled
in 1999. My friend calls me and tells me about a small little garden on 7th
Street that was going to be bulldozed. I said I don’t know what’s going on. I
thought this issue was resolved. I went for a walk. I saw Aresh. And he asked
me to draw him a coqui. And so I did and it pulled me in.
JK was not the only person pulled
into that campaign by Aresh or More Gardens!.
The coqui, a Puerto Rican tree
frog, was the organizing symbol for the campaign. Few campaigns brought the
divergent activists communities together like the campaign to save La Esperanza
Garden on East 7th street in the Lower East Side.
The middle of a campaign with a lot of heart.
Times up photo outside of Esperanza with Colin.
|
On
my way home from the holidays on December 25th, a friend passed out a flyer to
me as I was about to enter my apartment on Stanton Street. The flyer declared, “Esperanza Community
Garden and El Coqui need your immediately support!” The next day I walked to the garden a few
blocks away and was welcomed by a group of activists in the snowy space. It would be one of the most memorable
experiences I had had in activism. I was
not alone.
Aresh recalled:
That was a case where we really
were able to work with the community that was being threatened by
gentrification in 2000. It has the dynamic of this huge corporate developer,
Donald Capoccia, buying the administration and coming after community-minded
groups of people of Puerto Rican origins who had built a community, a block
group, co-op housing, and green spaces around them that they were sharing with
the community.
Throughout
the campaign, La Esperanza¾the 22-year old garden named
for hope¾had come to symbolize the tensions
between privatization frenzy of corporate globalization and the civic need for
public spaces open to all. Despite its history as a community center, in August
1999 the city sold La Esperanza to developer Donald Capoccia¾a man who had just happened to donate some $50,000 to the
mayor's electoral campaigns and acquired the garden site from the city outside
of a competitive bidding process. Giuliani claimed that Capoccia planned to
construct "low-income housing" on the site, and that garden
supporters were "not living in the real world.” In reality, the 79
apartments Capoccia slated to build were "80/20 housing"¾80% market-rate, luxury apartments, with a token 20% set
aside for low-income tenants.
In the
months after the garden settlement of May 1999, the city changed tactics. It began selling off individual gardens,
perhaps one or a small group at a time, but not enough to draw city-wide
attention along the lines of the May auction. All the while, the general public
believed all the city gardens had been saved. Yet the city continued to put
more Lower East Side community gardens up for auction. In December 1999,
developers ripped the wall off the back of the Esperanza garden, preparing to
bulldoze. The scene was a vivid reminder of how Capoccia had bulldozed the
Chico Menendez Garden on Christmas back in 1998. Activists, community members,
and friends of Esperanza were determined to prevent the same thing from
happening again.
Garden
advocates sought an injunction to save Esperanza after its sale. Little came of
it. Alicia Torres was the original gardener who had planted the seeds of
Esperanza back in 1977. “It was open to the children of the neighborhood. They
grew up there, and their own children would play and chase each other and fight
and do homework and blow out birthday candles there, and eat hot dogs,” JK
remembered. Adults would celebrate every
holiday major or minor. “There was a
gorgeous jungle rooster who lived in the garden and would hide from all the
people. He is brown, red, yellow, and black, and lovely beyond description.
Esperanza was always being used.”
In 1999, Torres
received a letter from Capoccia stating that construction would begin on the
land in a week. Having traversed every legal and policy channel they knew of,
activists sought alternate solutions. As Aresh explained:
Garden activists created a magical
creature – the coqui, which meant so much to their own community and the larger
Puerto Rican community in the world. And then to allow the gardeners, the local
residents, the artists, and activists, as well as thousands of people from all
over the world, being able to connect and to share to understand this magic and
to come and sleep and stay inside this giant frog – it was just so fantastic.
In Puerto Rican
folklore, the coqui has long been known to successfully vanquish larger
adversaries. Esperanza could use the same sort of mythology. JK explained how
activists mobilized around this story:
The story of the coqui is that
there was a horrific monster in the woods. And all the other animals were
terrified. And they were shivering and running away and the coqui encounters
the lightning bug and the dragon fly and the mouse and they said, ‘What’s going
on? Don’t you hear this roaring sound coming out of the forest? Its terrible.’
And the coqui said, ‘All right everybody calm down. I’ll take care of it.’ The
little tiny frog hopped into the darkness. And the roaring continued. But
suddenly you heard an enormous frog sound. It sounded like it was coming from
an animal about ten feet high. And the monster, who could not see in the dark,
figured he must be even larger than he was and he left. And the little tiny
coqui hopped right out. And he told all these trembling animals that they could
go back to bed. It was safe. So the coqui makes an enormous noise but is very
small. More Gardens made an enormous noise but we were very small.
Garden activists
built a giant steel and canvas version of the coqui for the garden. “And the
kids on the block helped make it, put the wire mesh under it,” explained JK.
“Eric cut out the two eye balls, and put in these big plexiglass globes which
were the eyes. And they were the windows.” The ten foot tall frog faced the
street, drawing crowds of sympathizers to the cause of the garden, as art and
activism overlapped. “The day that we
inaugurated it, we had all these kids come in and they made puppets together. They enacted the story I just told you,”
recalled JK. “They had the big pea costume. There were all these creatures
running around and making noises. The adults would come over. In the morning we
had breakfasts donated… We would have the most amazing gourmet food –
croissants, espresso.”
People
from all over the city came to see the coqui and help support the garden. “With
the big frog, I went down there and checked that out,” Tim Becker recalled. The
practical applications of the space were infinite. “The frog,” as Becker
described it, helped garden activists build on the lessons of their past
losses:
They were fortifying Esperanza and
that was on the hit list. What happened was the bulldozers and the police
slipped into Chico Mendez before anyone could be in the garden. So the idea was
to not let that happen again. So Aresh, the mad scientist that he is, said
we’ll build this big home there. And we’ll live there before anything can
happen. So, they made the papier-mâché frog, or coqui, and people started
living in there and having a good time.
Activists could spend the night
inside the structure, equipped with telephone lines, a heater, and materials to
lock themselves down to the coqui if bulldozers were to roll in early in the
morning. “[I]t was so beautiful. The coqui was just so magnificent ,” recalled
Michael Shenker. “People’s involvement
and the winter and the fire pit over there and the solidarity with the Torres
family, their willingness just to say ‘do it.’”
Between
late December and February, a spirit of play pulsed through the garden and
those who both enjoyed and defended the space. Many in the More Gardens! maintained a
distinct philosophy of ‘deep ecology.’ Here, a close relationship between
gardeners and their community translated into a joyous feeling of connection.
“This deep ecology is a way of being in the world with an understanding that we
are a part of the web of life,” explained JK.
“We can realize that the planet is a living, breathing being, who is
incredibly wise, ancient, and conscious.”
And while ideologies, such as deep ecology and Marxist humanism tend to
conflict, most involved with the campaign maintained a sense of ideological
flexibility, with an emphasis on direct action.
Many shared a non-church spiritual love of the gardens which derived
just as much inspiration from the pagans and Radical Faeries, as anything else.
Few were very doctrinaire about politics; what they cared about was saving the
garden.
It
was also a space which cultivated liberatory play. “I teach a lot of kids,”
Aresh explained “And knowing they can put their hands in dirt, play with worms,
and be themselves. And you must play this game, wear this lipstick and these
clothes. You are not worrying about clothes.”
This is a space where they grow via their free flowing play (also see Brown,
2009; Linn, 2008; Wenner, 2009).
People
from all over the city supported the garden. For JK and many others, social Eros
and play became an intrinsic part of the campaign:
It turned into quite a scene. It
was a dating scheme. People would take their lovers into the coqui. They were
actually booking the coqui weeks in advance. There was lots of blankets. There
was room for two people. There was a phone. A heater. It was quite comfortable
accommodations.
Tim Becker concurred when I asked
him about what happened in the coqui at night. “Don’t come a knocking when the
van’s rocking. That’s what I heard.” At one of the coqui slumber parties, JK
was interrupted:
One night I slept in the coqui and
I was drifting off and I heard this scrambling noise outside. I looked around
and it was Aresh scrambling like the skin on the coqui. And so he pops in and
makes his bed next to me and the two of us. And we hear this noise outside and
it’s this drunk guy. And he says, ‘Hey frog. How’re you doing?’ And we say,
‘Fine.’ And he says, ‘What you got a woman in there.’ And so it was like that.
(Laughs).
The
space created room for a lot of community building. “They had a lot of fire
circles too,” Becker remembered. At the time, one of the garden organizers said
the warmest place in New York City that winter was the outside fire in
Esperanza Garden. The space functioned as a sort of public commons. “Every
night there was a fire,” JK remembered.
“People would come from every walk of life, every philosophy, every
economic strata, and different countries. And they’d come and they’d
pontificate and they’d philosophize. It was very playful, very fun.” Tim Becker reveled in the fact that, “they
were having cookouts there and people were getting to know each other.”
[Insert – brad will and company
howling, billy at esperanza last day of
1999, #35, #36] I remember on December 31, 1999 being in
Esperanza with the tomato. Some guys were doing a play. And everyone was
dressed as garden vegetables. Bill
DiPaulo from TIMES UP! said to Reverend Billy, “I am a tomato! I am a tomato!” “You’re
a crazy fuck,” Billy responded, in just.
Yet, at the time, DiPaulo seemed to believe it. This was also a moment of looking at the
world from other perspectives for just a minute, of seeing luminal openings for
new social meanings and transformations (Turner, 1982). Organizing overlapped with poetry, within a Whitmanesque
view of what democracy could be. “We’re forever altered whenever anything
changes on the planet,” JK mused. “When a garden is sucked off the earth, we
feel it.” Many felt it the day Esperanza was bulldozed (see Chivers, 2000).
On
the day of the eviction – February 15, 2000 -
New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer was filing papers calling for an
injunction barring the destruction of all gardens that morning. No injunction
could go into effect until 2 p.m. that afternoon at the earliest, but if
activists could stall the police and bulldozers all morning, there was a chance
the garden could be saved. Some activists locked themselves to the surrounding
fence with bicycle locks around their necks, while another group locked
themselves to a 45-foot high steel tower of a sunflower and tripods. Five
activists locked themselves inside the coqui.
And I stood chanting with activists locked inside the fence.
Police
swarmed the front of the garden while a bulldozer loomed in the distance at the
back. The activists were locked inside. The police moved in, tearing down the
fence in front of the garden, sawing off the chain of an activist who had
locked herself to it. While protestors were being arrested, Giuliani restated
the usual debate that the city has to decide between housing or gardens, as if
it is a zero sum game. Garden activist spokespeople retorted that with
thousands of vacant lots and dilapidated buildings to rebuild in the five
boroughs, there is room for both gardens and housing. While More Gardens! had
successfully constructed a multicultural coalition, mobilizing activists from
all over the city, this was not enough to match the deep pockets of New York’s
real estate industry and their influence on the city’s political culture. Aresh
explained:
In terms of Esperanza, we
regrettably lost the space and the coqui was destroyed. A lot of people said,
‘Get the frog out of there. You can save it. The garden is gone.’ And I was
like, ‘This is not about a little art piece. It’s about the bigger picture. The
coqui is the garden. The garden is that. And the people who are there who are
going to be hurt are part of this frog. And no matter what, this is
inseparable.’ Its semi-permeable. It’s an art that has the life and heart of
the seeds that surround it. So what became of that destruction was, to me,
like, as the frog was destroyed, there were seeds that were exploding and
flying all over the city. And we have little froglets that, as JK so
wonderfully puts it, have grown by hearing it, who said, ‘I was not part of it
but I want to make sure that does not happen again. I want to make sure that
there is something of this creativity and greenery and there is something
coming from it.’
“Of all of the sacrifices, ones that
we’ve lost, one that I thought we kind of transcended our defeat was
Esperanza,” explained Michael Shenker. The Times
quoted Shenker quoting Sophocles as he was arrested during that action:
“Giuliani fooliani, the furies will be
following you for the rest of your days.”
As with many of the other cases in this study, even the activists are
aware their struggle takes place on a tragicomic stage. Play was even part of the jail experience,
which the police did not appreciate. When Shenker, Becker, Brad Will and myself
started to meditate and simultaneously “oooom” as part of our prayer, voices
rose as the meditation grew louder and longer.
More activists started to chime in.
And eventually the cops barged in admonishing us: “Being in jail is not
supposed to be one.” Brad Will, Tim
Doody, and Tim Becker on the guys side, Brooke Lehman, Jennifur Witburn and LA
Kauffman on the women’s side – we all did our best to make it a worthwhile
experience. Still, the 36 hours in jail
were exhausting. The cell space was
crowded and the hours seemed to go on and on.
I ended up calling in and missing two days of work, only to be chastised
by supervisors when I returned. The gap
between work and play can become a chasm.
Yet, the time was worth the effort. As we were going through the system, the
Attorney General issued a Temporary Restraining Order on bulldozing gardens and
eventually a settlement to protect the gardens from 2002 – 2010 (Spitzer, 2002,
2002a).
“Community
gardens, they are precious to me,” JK explained as she looked back on her work
on that campaign. “They are so important in the hope of the community.”
For her and many other,
Esperanza was a catalyst to act. The caring spirit of the space continued. “I
think that’s what really got me. A lot of people to this day identify
themselves with More Gardens! because of their emotional connection to Esperanza,”
JK noted. “I was so enchanted that I
started acting locally, at least for a little while. And you can see the
results of your actions when you act locally. It’s very empowering.”
The
following summer of 2001, members or More Gardens worked with those defending
Charas and others spaces to push the notion of a public referendum around the
garden issue. JK viewed the referenda process as part of an ongoing DiY
struggle to save space. T his meant “sing or make a puppet or draw a coqui or
climb a sunflower - you could do that.”
But it also meant taking a step into New York City politics, in a slightly
ludic fashion explained JK:
We took out all these petitions to all these
concerts and the philharmonic and the gay pride parade and got our signatures.
And when it came time to deliver the signatures, we had a couple of councilmen
standing on the steps of City Hall. We had Norm Seigel. And we were dressed as
peas and butterflies and caterpillars and tomatoes. …But it was so much fun,
especially in that repressive moment to do politics in that playful way.
Part of the
richness of organizing around the referendum was bringing a sense of pleasure
to the dour often theatre of New York City politics. “And then there is always the
big ‘you are not going to get credibility if you go on New York One [a local
television] with a big bird head,’” JK explained. Yet the group persevered.
The
Attorney General’s Temporary Restraining Order prevented further bulldozing in
the final two years of the Giuliani administration from February 2000 after
Esperanza until after he left office in 2001.
Another 200 gardens were made permanent park space in the fall of 2002
in a settlement between the Spitzer and the new mayor, Michael Bloomberg, which
was to last until 2010 (Spitzer, 2002, 2002a). Many have argued that the legal
settlement that came out of the Esperanza campaign was a success. The Attorney
General even noted that the reason he imposed the temporary restraining order
was because “a giant tomato told me to.”
While the
Spitzer/Bloomberg settlement represented real progress, some 150 other
community gardens remained vulnerable (Earth Celebrations, 2004). All these
actions seemed to compel neighborhood members to participate in a process of
creating change. Their campaign involved a savvy use of research along with an
engaging model of protest, which bridged a praxis divide between a theoretical
demand for public space and a real world struggle over land use in a global
city. As William Etundi recalled:
Around Esperanza, that was a
campaign that was quite clearly lost; the garden was destroyed. But that really
gelled a whole lot of people around a specific thing, a lot of specific
connections between people. It was an emotional everything. It was challenging.
It was growth. It was building connections, networks. It really catalyzed
different sectors of people around one thing.
If there is one lesson from Esperanza, it is a loss to one garden is a loss to all gardens.
Mayor de Blasio. Support housing using vacant lots, not community gardens.
If there is one lesson from Esperanza, it is a loss to one garden is a loss to all gardens.
Mayor de Blasio. Support housing using vacant lots, not community gardens.
Being an activist is a 24/7 job. Running into legal troubles can happen 24/7, though, when you are protesting and - sometimes - being accused of trespassing. The best advice I can give to anyone who is passionate enough to protest is to also plan ahead. This way, if something unexpected occurs and things go wrong, someone is waiting in the wings to help out.
ReplyDeleteEliseo Weinstein @ JR's Bail Bonds