People voiced a range of opinions about the GowanusRezoning hearing on Thursday.
“I wanna support this but there is something rotten in Denmark,” said one observer, noting the commitment to NYCHA funding was inadequate.
Andrew called for 75% affordable housing, not 25%.
Others were concerned with displacement and homogenization.
“We need the funky mix,” said Martin, whose lived and owned a business here for more than four decades.
Of the 150 people to testify in person, some two thirds opposed the rezoning as a “hyper gentrification” giveaway.
Testimony by Benjamin Heim Shepard, PhD.
I am writing to express my disapproval of this rezoning.
My testimony is based on my experience as someone who has lived, worked and brought up kids in the impacted areas for well over two decades. I have no ties to the real estate industry.
What I do have are environmental, aesthetic, and justice-based concerns over the rezoning.
As a social worker, I am concerned that the affordable housing is not being done right. It needs to be spread throughout the neighborhood, as opposed to placing thousands of people on toxic land at Public Place, a former manufactured gas plant site with coal tar plumes over 150 feet below the surface that will not be fully removed.
- The combined sewer overflow tanks will not be built before the rezoning development starts. This risks undoing the superfund cleanup remedy.
- The draft environmental impact statement is illegal. The rezoning must not go forward until it is redone with EPA and FEMA helping prepare the EIS as involved agencies as required by law.
- The process for this hearing is flawed.
- The joint community board hearing tonight is illegal. Under city law, each community board must hold its own ULURP public hearing.
- The judge has not yet issued a final ruling on our Voice of Gowanus lawsuit; this hearing format is not legal under the text of city law, not uniform or equal to what other neighborhoods were afforded, and the city is rushing this during a pandemic to exclude the community.
- The Gowanus rezoning would place thousands of people in FEMA Flood Zone A and permit land elevation changes that put residents of Gowanus Houses at increased flood risk.
- This is not a community-based plan. All the window-dressing by politicians and developers and the non-profits cannot hide the fact that this plan is being imposed on us. It is primarily about developer profits, not affordable housing, racial justice, or cleanup.
- Communities, not developers should direct their own development. Yet, sadly this is just another developer giveaway.
- This is a Disney model of planning and cultural displacement. They want to stamp out what is special here.
- Please vote no to this rezoning.
Benjamin Heim Shepard
Before the hearing, Voice of the Gowanus sent out a blast about the hearing:
The only community board public hearing on Mayor de Blasio's massive and dangerous Gowanus Rezoning Proposal—twice the size of Atlantic Yards—is happening at 5:30pm this Thursday, June 3rd at J.J. Byrne Playground in Park Slope.
In order to participate, you must register. But to register in advance, the City is forcing residents to call a special phone line today or tomorrow between 10am - 5pm.
As you can see, the City is trying its best to make it as difficult as possible to participate in this hearing. THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO ATTEND BECAUSE THEY KNOW THE COMMUNITY OPPOSES THEIR PLAN.
That's why it is URGENT that you call right now and register TODAY!
Call 718-780-8280 (before 5pm) to register for Thursday's hearing. They will ask you a series of questions, including your position on the rezoning—you are not required to answer that question and/or can reserve the right to change your mind.
PLEASE REGISTER TODAY BECAUSE WE NEED YOUR VOICE IN ORDER TO FIGHT FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
After the hearing,